On 11/26/06, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 17:42 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Michael Schwendt schrieb: > > On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:48:31 -0800, Christopher Stone wrote: > >[...] > >> There needs to be a way to > >> blacklist these packages from showing up in the report or else send > >> them to another interested party such as fedora-legacy > > I've suggested a black-list several times before without clear > > feedback. Black-listing packages is like hiding something under the > > carpet. > > Agreed, until now I don't see any good reason for a blacklist. How about FESCO implementing some rules on "taking consequences" from EVR issues in FE not being taken care about? E.g. "broken deps > 4weeks", and the package will be automatically orphaned plus the maintainer's account will be withdrawn/canceled?
This sounds a little overkill (despite I agree 4 weeks are plenty of time to fix broken deps). Wouldn't be enough to remove the offending package from the repo? -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
