Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:11:15 -0800, Christopher Stone wrote:

> > The report is not "spam", and one message per day is far from a flood.
> > It is just one report some packagers hate, because it shows where FE sucks
> > quite a lot (ABI breakage, e.g.).
> 
> Could you have the FC3/4 breakage parts split up into another e-mail
> and send that part to a fedora legacy mailing list?

Breakage in Extras is of interest to us, since usually it can be fixed
with updates, rebuilds, and so on. If help from Core/Legacy is needed,
bugzilla is the place where to ask for that.

What to report where is just a matter of running a different report
script.

Repoclosure is run on all of Core + Updates + Legacy + Extras from FC-3 to
Rawhide, but only broken packages in Extras are reported to this list. The
full repoclosure output is not lost, as it's kept on disk for 14 days.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux