On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:17:53 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:19:15 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, 21 November 2006 at 10:35, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:20:13 +0100, David Jansen wrote: > > > > > > > > > I found a bug in agrep, FC5 x86_64 version, it produces different results > > > > > than the same invocation on i686 on the same plain text file. > > > > > However, agrep is not listed in the bugzilla components of Fedora > > > > > Extras. > > > > > > > > agrep is not in Fedora Extras. > > > > > > Of course it is. Look at what SRPM it is built from. ;) > > > > So? > > > > I think he is referring to the "tre" SRPM package: however, I'm not > sure what's the command to determine from what SRPM a given RPM is > built from... Aha, that's not the original and famous http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrep which has an incompatible license. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
