On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 23:31 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 05:26:27PM -0400, Michel Salim wrote: > > On 10/7/06, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > >Hello, > > It would make sense (to me, anyway) to have the deprecated modules > > packaged like normal, as you suggested, but perhaps with an ifdef. > > Probably set them to be built by default for now? > > They have to be packaged unconditionnally because the > gwyddion-plugin-examples need them. Lemme make this clear. If the user downloads something in your package/subpackage, and it doesn't work because of a missing dependency (e.g. perl/python/ruby) not present, then you screwed up. Don't assume your users have a sane environment, or even that your users possess the faintest amount of clue. Not having necessary Requires for things is a blocker. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway || Red Hat || Fedora || Aurora || GPG ID: 93054260 "We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law. We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men -- not from men who feared to write, to speak, to associate and to defend causes that were, for the moment, unpopular." -- Edward R. Murrow, March 9, 1954 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
