Hello, There is a review for gwyddion submitted by David Necas, it is his first package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 I am doing a review, but it is stalled, and I am not completly sure on what is right. We are disagreeing on the packaging of some modules (python, perl and ruby). These modules are there to handle a file format used by some kind of gwyddion plugins. These kind of plugins are more or less deprecated, but some examples are packaged in the gwyddion-plugin-examples subpackage. Currently David put the modules in the libs subpackage (together with the gwyddion libs), below %{_libdir}/%{name}, without having the subpackage requires the interpreters (python, perl and ruby). His reasoning is that they are available, and a user has to have the interpreter available anyway, so no need to Requires them. Nothing shows that the modules are in this subpackage, and users have to set set some path explicitely, but for him having those bits a bit hard to use it is not an issue since it is associated with a deprecated interface. I disagree, and tend to think that these modules should be packaged as far as possible like usual modules, each in a subpackage with a dependency on the interpreter. I don't have a clear opinion on this, could you have one? -- Pat -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list