Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

Frank Büttner schrieb:
Today somebody again has modify one of my maintained packages, without
talk about to me. This is the last warning. When some body do it again,
I will stop all my activity's for FC extra. When someone find an Bug
then open an Bugreport!!! And don't modify my packages!!!

We IIRC don't yet have any specific written rules that handle this kind
of stuff (anyone interested in working out some rules? FESCo always
needs help!).

The general practice is that only the maintainer changes his packages
normally. I don't like that to much. I think we should give other
maintainers who know their job well (read=sponsors,co-maintainers and
well know/long term contributors) a bit more freedom to fix small or
medium size things in other peoples packages without to much overhead
(read=bugzilla). *Especially* if the maintainer doesn't react in time.

Sure, errors will happen and there will be some fights over details now
and then, but I think the general quality of Extras will improve if we
work in a *slightly* more wiki-style approach.


How often do people get upset about modifying each other's packages?

It would be a BAD idea if we need ACL's to restricting people to only their own packages. Especially in a volunteer driven community, we need the flexibility and low-overhead of being mostly open. If we get a point where we need more restrictive ACL's by default, then that would be a sad situation. That would mean we don't trust each other as maintainers.

In practice things go pretty well under the current system. Generally each maintainer is expected to respect ownership of others. In many cases owners give explicit or even blanket permission to others, "Sure, I trust you to do the right thing." In other cases, maintainers ask for permission before making specific changes.

I see this particular case where there was no response to a bug report for a month as perfectly acceptable. The system is not broken, although it could be perhaps codified in a clearer way in the Wiki if it isn't already.

Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux