On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 23:38 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "CA" == Christopher Aillon <caillon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > CA> The same thing that happens if I say I'll maintain them today, > CA> rebuild them, and then the day that FC6 is released, say I don't > CA> want them anymore. > If this happened with some regularity, the contributor would probably get a warning and then be de-sponsored. Maintaining packages is about *maintaining*. It means being responsible for them. It means being available to take care of bugs, issue updates, and liaison with upstream. If you don't have the time to do this responsibly then you shouldn't be pretending you can maintain the package. > So we should just give up and not bother trying to get unmaintained > things out of the distro? Or do you instead have something > constructive to offer? I second this. Give us ideas so we can work out something that serves everyone's needs better. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
