Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/10/06, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 12:17 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>>> "RC" == Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> RC> In addition to all this, another issue has popped up, which IMO
>> RC> renders shipping static libs as part of Fedora very questionable
>> RC> (to say the least)
>> RC> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209316
>>
>> Surely this is a bug in RPM,
> RH's rpm maintainers don't seem to agree, they closed it "WONTFIX" :(

It was jbj that closed it it WONTFIX, not the RH rpm maintainer.

It's unfortunate, but RHs rpm maintainer very rarely comments on rpm
bugs, which helps perpetuatethe idea that jeff johnson is still the
maintainer.

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux