Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Corsepius wrote:

> On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 10:45 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:

>> Either dietlibc OK for Extras and for Extras pkgs to link-against/use it,
>> or not.

> I am in favor of changing the GuileLines to require *-static (which
> would require dietlibc to be renamed) and to require someones explicit
> permission on any case of static linkage.

+1, agreed, reasonable.

-- Rex



-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux