On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 22:39 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Callum Lerwick (seg@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > It should probably be "media-production" to match the name I recommended > > for the SIG. I chose that name exactly for this reason, its hard to draw > > a line between audio and video because video usually involves audio (and > > music) as well. > > > > Drawing a line between media consumption, and production is much > > clearer. > > But then do you blow up the graphics component and move in inkscape > and the gimp? I would label gimp and inkscape as print publishing tools, which does not fall under audio/video media. Yes, its arguable that print media could fall under the name "Media Production", but they don't really seem directly related to me. I'm trying to balance having too many groups (music/audio and video gets hard to distinguish between, when you consider something like Cinelerra.) versus too few. (Adding print to the mix seems like too much) I suppose it could be "Audio/Video Media Production" but that's getting a bit long. "A/V Production" maybe... -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
