Anthony Green (green@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > Fedora Extras now contains a collection of applications geared towards > music and audio production. These packages have, for the most part, > migrated from PlanetCCRMA to Extras. I only learned about editing the > comps.xml file today, and noticed that the most applicable group is.... > > <id>sound-and-video</id> > <_name>Sound and Video</_name> > <_description>From CD recording to playing audio CDs and multimedia > files, \this package group allows you to work with sound and video on > the system.</_description> > > I'd like to propose a new group for these new apps... > > <id>audio-production</id> > <_name>Audio Production</_name> > <_description>This is a collection of applications and plugins > geared towards audio production and includes audio recorders, MIDI > sequencers and software synthesizers.</_description> > > The initial list of packages for this group would be something like ... > > <packagereq type="optional">ardour</packagereq> > <packagereq type="optional">audacity</packagereq> > <packagereq type="optional">fluidsynth</packagereq> > <packagereq type="optional">fluidsynth-dssi</packagereq> > <packagereq type="optional">hexter-dssi</packagereq> > <packagereq type="optional">jack-audio-connection-kit</packagereq> > <packagereq type="optional">lash</packagereq> > <packagereq type="optional">qjackctl</packagereq> > <packagereq type="optional">qsynth</packagereq> > <packagereq type="optional">rosegarden4</packagereq> > <packagereq type="optional">seq24</packagereq> > <packagereq type="optional">soundtracker</packagereq> > <packagereq type="optional">sweep</packagereq> > <packagereq type="optional">swh-plugins</packagereq> > <packagereq type="optional">zynaddsubfx</packagereq> Hm, I'd like to somewhat avoid fracturing the comps file too much. Is there a reason Sound & Video isn't appropriate? Would we split again for video production? Bill -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
