On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 14:04 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Thorsten Leemhuis schrieb: > > > > Paul Howarth schrieb: > >> On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 11:28 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >>> I just ran my scripts again. It seems there are sill some arch specific > >>> packages that were not rebuild, but needs.rebuild was removed. See this > >>> list: > >> ... > >>>> paul_AT_city-fan.org libpng10 1.0.20-3.fc6 > >> ... > >>> Is there any good reason why these packages were not rebuild? > >> The stated goals of the rebuild are: > > [...] > >> Now I *could* bump the EVR and rebuild this package, but it seems rather > >> pointless to me. > > > > Please rebuild it. tia. > > > BTW, I could give reasons for it. But most can be found in the > list-archives around the date when we did the the mass-rebuild for FC5. > > The biggest one that now: We waited for a "go" from Core and started > when binutils and other changes were considers stable. That was not the > case in early August iirc. OK, bumped and rebuilt. Paul. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
