Thorsten Leemhuis schrieb: > > Paul Howarth schrieb: >> On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 11:28 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> I just ran my scripts again. It seems there are sill some arch specific >>> packages that were not rebuild, but needs.rebuild was removed. See this >>> list: >> ... >>>> paul_AT_city-fan.org libpng10 1.0.20-3.fc6 >> ... >>> Is there any good reason why these packages were not rebuild? >> The stated goals of the rebuild are: > [...] >> Now I *could* bump the EVR and rebuild this package, but it seems rather >> pointless to me. > > Please rebuild it. tia. > BTW, I could give reasons for it. But most can be found in the list-archives around the date when we did the the mass-rebuild for FC5. The biggest one that now: We waited for a "go" from Core and started when binutils and other changes were considers stable. That was not the case in early August iirc. CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
