Matthias Saou wrote:
buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote :
UNKNOWN OWNER (possibly Core package):
Since all of these aren't directly relevant to Extras, I'm assuming
they aren't reaching their maintainers like they should, so...
audit
FC5-updates > FC6 (0:1.2.7-4.fc5 > 0:1.2.7-2)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208532
device-mapper
FC4-updates > FC5 (0:1.02.07-2.0 > 0:1.02.02-3.2)
FC4-updates > FC6 (0:1.02.07-2.0 > 0:1.02.07-1.1)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208533
eclipse-changelog
FC4 > FC6 (1:2.0.1_fc-21 > 0:2.3.1-1.fc6)
FC5-updates > FC6 (1:2.1.0_fc-2 > 0:2.3.1-1.fc6)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208534
lvm2
FC4-updates > FC5 (0:2.02.06-1.0.fc4 > 0:2.02.01-1.2.1)
FC6 not affected.
mozilla
FL3-updates > FC4-updates (37:1.7.13-1.3.1.legacy > 37:1.7.13-1.1.fc4)
FL3-updates > FC5-updates (37:1.7.13-1.3.1.legacy > 37:1.7.13-1.1.fc5)
FC6 not affected (now that firefox from Core obsoletes mozilla).
perl-Net-DNS
FC5-updates > FC6 (0:0.59-1.fc5 > 0:0.58-1.fc6)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208535
quagga
FC4-updates > FC5-updates (0:0.98.6-1.fc4 > 0:0.98.6-1.FC5)
FC6 not affected.
tar
FC5-updates > FC6 (0:1.15.91-1.FC5 > 0:1.15.91-1)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208536
I hope these minor (but important) rebuilds will make it into the final
FC6 tree so that we have the cleanest possible upgrade path.
Note that some of the EVR issues in the "Extras" section actually need
to be fixed by updates to a Core package (i.e. in some cases where a
package has moved from Extras to Core).
So perl-String-CRC32 needs an FC5 update for example, which I requested
in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191686
Paul.
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
