buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote : > UNKNOWN OWNER (possibly Core package): Since all of these aren't directly relevant to Extras, I'm assuming they aren't reaching their maintainers like they should, so... > audit > FC5-updates > FC6 (0:1.2.7-4.fc5 > 0:1.2.7-2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208532 > device-mapper > FC4-updates > FC5 (0:1.02.07-2.0 > 0:1.02.02-3.2) > FC4-updates > FC6 (0:1.02.07-2.0 > 0:1.02.07-1.1) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208533 > eclipse-changelog > FC4 > FC6 (1:2.0.1_fc-21 > 0:2.3.1-1.fc6) > FC5-updates > FC6 (1:2.1.0_fc-2 > 0:2.3.1-1.fc6) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208534 > lvm2 > FC4-updates > FC5 (0:2.02.06-1.0.fc4 > 0:2.02.01-1.2.1) FC6 not affected. > mozilla > FL3-updates > FC4-updates (37:1.7.13-1.3.1.legacy > 37:1.7.13-1.1.fc4) > FL3-updates > FC5-updates (37:1.7.13-1.3.1.legacy > 37:1.7.13-1.1.fc5) FC6 not affected (now that firefox from Core obsoletes mozilla). > perl-Net-DNS > FC5-updates > FC6 (0:0.59-1.fc5 > 0:0.58-1.fc6) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208535 > quagga > FC4-updates > FC5-updates (0:0.98.6-1.fc4 > 0:0.98.6-1.FC5) FC6 not affected. > tar > FC5-updates > FC6 (0:1.15.91-1.FC5 > 0:1.15.91-1) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208536 I hope these minor (but important) rebuilds will make it into the final FC6 tree so that we have the cleanest possible upgrade path. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 5.92 (FC6 Test3) - Linux kernel 2.6.18-1.2699.fc6 Load : 0.32 0.28 0.27 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
