Rex Dieter wrote:
Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
I am currently reviewing toped :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200
In the review process, I checked the binary rpm rebuilt by rpmlint
as "rpmlint toped-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm", and the result was clean.
However, once I install toped and try "rpmlint toped", I get lots
of "undefined non-weak symbol" complaint like:
W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0
wxEVT_LOG_ERRMESSAGE W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0 CmdList W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0 wxEVT_FUNC_BROWSER W: toped
undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 Properties W: toped
undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK5DBboxmlERK3CTM
W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0
_ZN8SGBitSetD1Ev W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross11segmentlistD1Ev
............................
So my question is:
B. Are these complaints BLOCKERs for approving this package?
Probably. It should at least be looked into.
-- Rex
Well, it seems difficult for me to resolve these complaints.
I asked the submitter of this bug to contact upstream, however,
it would be appreciated if someone would resolve this issue.
Mamoru
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
