Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > I am currently reviewing toped : > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 > > In the review process, I checked the binary rpm rebuilt by rpmlint > as "rpmlint toped-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm", and the result was clean. > However, once I install toped and try "rpmlint toped", I get lots > of "undefined non-weak symbol" complaint like: > > W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0 > wxEVT_LOG_ERRMESSAGE W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol > /usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0 CmdList W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol > /usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0 wxEVT_FUNC_BROWSER W: toped > undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 Properties W: toped > undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK5DBboxmlERK3CTM > W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 > _ZN8SGBitSetD1Ev W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol > /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross11segmentlistD1Ev > ............................ > > So my question is: > B. Are these complaints BLOCKERs for approving this package? Probably. It should at least be looked into. -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
