On Saturday 02 September 2006 18:38, Jesse Keating wrote: > You need to decide how to read my use of "module" I suppose. I said a > 'python's module', eg something that you can do 'import foo' on in > python. A module can be many individual FILES. Some compiled, some > noncompiled. I did NOT use them interchangeable for a "patchon package" > whatever that may be. And a 'single-file module' is still a python > module, which is what I said. You've taken the base assumption that > when I said 'python's module' I meant a python rpm package and ran with > it, which is an incorrect assumption. This is the way I understood you, too. Nevertheless Sander asked whether he has to put all modules in his package in one directory or split the arch-dependend off. So your last sentence "So it'd all have to go in sitearch." (in your answer) without having in mind that your mail was not the direct answer to Sander's question may have caused some confusion. Regards, Till
Attachment:
pgpbfc0VIIB4p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
