Hi, Althrough Fedora Core provides SCIM for CJK InputMethod, but the scim still not good enough for Traditional Chinese people to use it. (Most of Traditional Chinese people, especially in Taiwan, prefer gcin than scim.) So my reason to request gcin branch for FC-3 and FC-4 is simple. Now I still maintain and package the gcin for FC5 FC4 FC3 and RHEL4 on cle.linux.org.tw. (People can download gcin from http://cle.linux.org.tw/gcin/) Because I want to make it easy to use gcin for those people still using FC-3 and FC-4, so I request FC-3 FC-4 branch, too. If branch for FC-3 and FC-4 is really discouraged, it is OK. I will give up to request it. (I can just put FC3 and FC4 RPMs on http://cle.linux.org.tw/gcin/) Thanks a lot Chung-Yen Chang 2006/8/24, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
PFJ wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 08:34 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: >> A request has been made for an FC4 and FC3 branch of gcin. Has this >> request been approved by the FESco? >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded > > Not sure they have to be approved by FESco as they really now come under > Legacy. FC-3 and FC-4 branches *do* need FESCo approval, as described on the CVSSyncNeeded page referenced above: FC-3 and FC-4 branches require FESCo approval and are generally discouraged -- see EOL policy for details. It would be prudent for the package maintainer to justify this request in the review ticket for the package concerned if it has not already been done. Paul. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
-- Chung-Yen Chang (candyz0416@xxxxxxxxx) RHCE Cert Number: 806200500202093 MSN: candyz0416@xxxxxxx Gizmo: candyz0416 Skype: candyz0416 http://blog.kandix.idv.tw/ -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
