On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:37:39PM -0500, Steven Pritchard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 07:54:09PM +0200, Paul Wouters wrote: > > So, either this should go to the sysadmins responsoble for redhat, > > It's definitely their problem. > > > or it should go as a bug report to perl-Mail-SPF-Query. > > Please don't do that. :-) I agree, whether a mail domain hosting some resources of Fedora has some policy on SPF and whether SPF is available to other users thorugh Fedora is a different story. We don't want to endorse either side through the repo's contents. Paul, could you contact postmaster@ which is the `person' the RFCs scapegoat for such a case? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpz3Hi7APBoX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
