>>>>> "RD" == Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: RD> In the hopes of furthering the discussion can we at least agree RD> that the current kmod scheme works, at least to some people's RD> perception of what that means. I hope, also, that we can agree RD> that the current kmod scheme does have limitations/shortcomings. RD> With that in mind, I think this (should) all boil down to the RD> question: which weighs more heavily in your mind, the RD> pain/suffering(*) of involved in 1. Adopting/changing-to a new RD> (kmdl) standard 2. living with the limitations/shortcomings that RD> come with using kmod. ? Would the same problems that we have with kernel modules appear with e.g. apache modules, if having two different apache versions installed was possible? /Benny -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
