Patrice Dumas wrote: >>I like them too, but they are for power users and comps is (AFAIK) for >>the "ordinary" end user, so I think the current policy of not putting >>them in comps.xml is correct. > > > There are command line apps in comps, but not in all sections. For example > there are some in the "Hardware Support", "System Tools", "Development Tools", > there could be in "Engineering and Scientific". There are mathematical > libraries in "Engineering and Scientific". That's because what is an ordinary > user depends on the comps section. > > And I think it is right to add more command line apps if they fit in a > section intended for system administrators, developers or scientists. Another vitally important exception are applications such as rogue, nethack, and ularn. Though these would be more accurately described as terminal-based apps than command-line apps. --Mike
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
