Christian Iseli wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:39:35 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
How do we handle these, blacklist them?
Maybe.
Taking a quick look, I see that most packages you described as
(library) actually do have the keyword "library" in the owners.list
description, so for those I could take that into account.
You couldalso check the actual rpm contents, and if there is nothing
under /[s]bin or /usr/[s]bin then not complain, I don't know hoe hard
that would be though. The taking a look at owners.list descriptions
definetly is a good start!
The cmdline tools are more problematic...
I agree, not even looking at the rpms helps there, which leads to the
conclusion we really need a blacklist. Still the script could/should be
made a bit smarter like using owners.list descriptions to keep the size
of the blacklist down.
(As a side note: I tend to like cmdline tools, and would like
to see them listed in comps.xml anyway... but maybe that's just me)
I like them too, but they are for power users and comps is (AFAIK) for
the "ordinary" end user, so I think the current policy of not putting
them in comps.xml is correct.
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
