On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:32:39 -0700, Garrick Staples wrote: > Why bother with a Conflicts: tag? They already conflict, don't they? Explicit "Conflicts" make it clear that the conflict is intentional and known. Explicit "Conflicts" can be queried/examined/resolved more easily than finding out about it no later than with a first transaction check. > The name "qstat" is actually a requirement in POSIX 1003.2d, and as Axel > stated, it has been implemented by many batch queueing systems over the > decades. Valid point. The general part of my comment holds true, though, since for several other packages, pollution of /usr/bin or /usr/include is a reoccuring problem. It quickly gets nasty when example programs or small binary tools with very generic names are pulled in together with library packages. Generic file names are worth a second look during package review. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
