Michael Schwendt wrote:
Tonight I've received the following bug
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201279
I'm packager of the qstat tool. But the torque (in torque-client)
already consists the /usr/bin/qstat.
Why isn't this program called "torque-qstat"? You could patch it and
rename it like that. What is the sense in creating such a short and
generic name like "qstat"? Is the program useful outside of "torque"?
Could it be placed in /usr/libexec/torque/qstat instead if not renamed?
Thanks for opinoin, but I think some miscommunication is present here.
I'm not a packager of torque. As I understand you correctly the issue
inhere torque than qstat. Anyway I've filled bug to torque with
references to this maillist discussion already. I'm wating for torque
packager response.
--
With best regards,
Andy Shevchenko. mailto: andy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
