On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 00:57 +1200, Michael J. Knox wrote: > I think some cross compilers would be a good idea. I already use arm > regularly and will shortly have a need for nesC and some AVR cross > tools. If they are candidates for extras, I don't know. I don't really see why not. > I do now there was some discuss, which remains unresolved, as to the > naming convention to use for cross tool chain packages. Does it matter? Far too much masturbation goes on around here. > David Woodhouse wrote: > > Stuff like crosstool makes it relatively simple, but it's still slow -- I take that back, btw -- I've been fighting crosstool for a while this morning and I still haven't managed to build a simple ppc->i686 crosscompiler. And I don't even want glibc -- I _only_ want to build kernels. Not that that seems to be an option. The whole incestuous gcc/libgcc/libc thing needs to be fixed up and made relatively sane -- but that's outside the scope of this discussion, I suppose. -- dwmw2 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
