On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 08:56 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > seth vidal wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 00:43 +0200, Michał Bentkowski wrote: > >> Hi! > >> User Ian Chapman on > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611 placed a > >> review request to package with WTFPL license. And my question is > >> simple: is it permissible in Extras? > >> More information about it is here: http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/ > > > > > > I've forwarded this to the fedora legal contact. > > > > Why? Licenses don't get much free-er then this, I thought we only needed > to contact legal if we had questions about a license? Because the legal department needs a good chuckle every now and again. ;-) -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Docs Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
