Re: A licensing question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 12:06 -0700, Victor Skovorodnikov wrote:
> Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>         "non-commercial" is unacceptable.
>         
>         -jef
>         
>         -- 
>         fedora-extras-list mailing list
>         fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>         https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
> 
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> Would you please elaborate on as to why it is unacceptable?  I though
> Fedora is, by definitiion, non-commercial.

Open source by definition mandates the ability to distribute code
commercially 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8be956fd12dbe4ae927e65c989e7e83b9fcc0b80

Rahul

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux