Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugs98 - Haskell Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167974 ------- Additional Comments From gemi@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-18 15:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Apologies for "sitting" on this for too long. Better late than never :-) > 0) <http://cvs.haskell.org/Hugs/downloads/2005-03/> > Upstream are now using YYYY-MM to label download dirs at least, > so I wonder if it is better to use 2005.03 say for the version. > (eg Gentoo is using 2005.3) Ok > 1) rpmlint complains: > W: hugs98 invalid-license BSDish, see License file, GPL, LGPL > I think just calling it BSD would be sufficient. Ok > 2) There seems to a small build problem on fc5: > Skipping OpenAL package There are quite some incompatibilities between openal 0.0.9 and previous versions. > 3) Probably the description should be made more concise. Is the first paragraph enough? > 5) buildrequires need to be updated for modular X: I attach a diff below. Ok > 8) if demos/ (2.3MB) is to be included, it must be subpackaged into > a separate subpackage (say hugs98-demos). Ok, but I still install them into /usr/lib/hugs. One could also subpackage the packages like opengl etc... I prefer not to, but if you think it is better... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list