Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SOAPpy - Full-featured SOAP library for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188623 wart@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |wart@xxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-17 10:39 EST ------- MUST ==== * rpmlint output clean * Source matches upstream. md5sum: 51ac835366badedd932c64f26fa8336b SOAPpy-0.11.6.tar.gz * License (PSFL) ok, license file included * Package and spec file named appropriately * Spec file legible and in Am. English * Builds and packages in mock on FC-4 i386, FC-4 x86_64, devel i386, devel x86_64 * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * buildroot cleaned in at beginning of %install and in %clean * No duplicate files * Macro use consistent * Contains code, not content * No -devel package necessary * No .la archives * No .desktop file needed * Owns all directories that it creates. SHOULD ====== * There are some unit tests in the tests subdirectory. Consider running the test suite in the spec file to verify that the package works. * There are a lot of example scripts in contrib/, bid/, validate that could be included as example code in %doc. MUSTFIX ======= * Is BuildRequires: PyXML necessary? It seems to build fine without it. * The files in the docs subdirectory need to be added to %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
