On Friday 14 April 2006 15:50, Ed Hill wrote: > I vote for consistency. That is, all packages within both FE and FC are > eol-ed more-or-less simultaneously and are treated in a very similar > manner. The overall trend here seems to be a convergence (or a blurring > of the distinctions between) of FE and FC. Having different eol policy > and/or practice within FE/FC (or different expectations on a per-package > basis as Patrice suggests) is, IMO, a lot of confusion for very little > gain. +1 Unless it is a security update and it is done in the same spirit of FL... But then it is Fedora Extras Legacy... or even Fedora Legacy, why not? -- José Abílio -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
