On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:41:49PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > apt/synaptic have been orphaned since about half a year, anyone > > objecting in me taking over? > > Not really an objection, but do we want to confuse users with an extra > way to manage repositories. Also APT AFAIK still doesn't handle multi-lib. > > Is there any significant reason to use apt instead of yum? Don't get me > wrong choice usually is good, but this is a very fundamental piece of > the distro, and becoming so more and more. We also have only one kernel, > C-library and X-server and with good reasons. I was just asking about maintainership, not replacing yum with apt in Fedora Core ;) Also apt has seen quite some development lately including multilib and repomd support. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgppOmsmo6WPq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
