Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-TableExtract https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188293 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-11 04:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Yuk, so I have to have 7 random perl modules around just to run a test suite > that doesn't affect the actual build output? It would affect the build output if one of the tests failed, which might happen for instance when the package came to be built on an architecture you can't test yourself. The modules concerned are all available in Extras so there's no real hardship in installing them, and if you don't want them around on a long-term basis you could always "rpm -e" them afterwards. Better still, you could do test builds in mock and then those modules would never need to be installed on your system at all. Most of the perl module packages I've come across in Extras have buildreqs for all modules used in their test suites that are available in Core or Extras, > Note that the HTML tests actually require HTML::ElementTable on top of > TreeBuilder, and that's not in Extras, so adding the req doesn't help there. That's why I didn't ask you to include that one as a buildreq :-) Unless you'd like to package that one too... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
