Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paraview - Parallel visualization application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187932 ------- Additional Comments From orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-10 11:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > * it would be nice to have a .desktop file Got an initial version. Still needs a little more work. Suggestions? > rpmlint is also unhappy with the debuginfo package. There are lots of 'objdump > failed', that I don't know how to solve, but there are also some errors, because > lots of source files have the executable bit set. It could be possible to chmod > -x everything ending in .h .c .cxx. Could be done later, however. Added these to the existing chmod -x command. > * I would have chosed BSD-like for the licence, but Distributable is ok too. I thought this was better due to multpiple licenses. > * I don't know how much the -data and other packages are coupled. But if they > are the specific version release should be required, like > Requires: %{name}-data = %{version}-%{release} Very good - done. > NEEDSWORK: there are many man pages distributed in the paraview-mpi package, and > some cmake files that I believe shouldn't be packaged, the man pages refer to > non existant header files. I suppose that they might be useful for something, but certainly not as currently installed. I'll remove. Again, just need the new spec: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/paraview.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/paraview-2.4.3-3.src.rpm Still looking at the build issue... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
