Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://initng.thinktux.net/d|http://download.initng.think |ownload/v0.4/ |tux.net/v0.6/ ------- Additional Comments From daner964@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-03-24 02:23 EST ------- Initng 0.6.0RC1 has just been released. The big difference from earlier versions is that the scripts are released in a separate tarball. Question is what we want to do about this. It seems quite clear to me that it would be nice with separate rpm's, but does that mean having separate spec and srpm files as well or do we just add a Source1 and another %package section to the existing spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
