Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ularn - a text-based roguelike game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183089 ------- Additional Comments From wart@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-03-15 22:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Since I'm about to request yet another game SIG related review from you I > thought I would return the favor and see if there were still any open review > requests done by you, so here I'am :) :) > I haven't taken a look, but the sgid games stuff does not make me very happy. > I'll probably write up a patch which as the first thing of main opens the > highscore file, leaves an fd around for the highscore functions to use and then > drops the games group rights. Patches are always welcome. > The only issue which then remains is do we use > the games user / group for stuff like this, or do we create a user per game. I > must say I like the games user idea for simple on file cases, for more complex > stuff like daemons we should use a new user. What do you think? I think it's overkill to create users for a single setgid scoreboard file. Definitely we want to create them for game servers that run as daemon processes. I feel that this is the perfect use for the 'games' user/group. > Maybe we should > take this to the list? Anyways I think that whatever we decide we should put > this on the games-SIG wiki page as games-SIG policy. I posed the question to the -extras and -devel lists a couple of weeks ago, but nobody seemed to have an opinion on the setgid bits. I interpreted that to mean that there were no objections. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-March/msg00002.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-March/msg00000.html This is also in the SIG wiki, but could probably be clarified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
