Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ularn - a text-based roguelike game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183089 j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-03-15 16:57 EST ------- Since I'm about to request yet another game SIG related review from you I thought I would return the favor and see if there were still any open review requests done by you, so here I'am :) I haven't taken a look, but the sgid games stuff does not make me very happy. I'll probably write up a patch which as the first thing of main opens the highscore file, leaves an fd around for the highscore functions to use and then drops the games group rights. The only issue which then remains is do we use the games user / group for stuff like this, or do we create a user per game. I must say I like the games user idea for simple on file cases, for more complex stuff like daemons we should use a new user. What do you think? Maybe we should take this to the list? Anyways I think that whatever we decide we should put this on the games-SIG wiki page as games-SIG policy. I'll start a real review tomorrow, as usual with the kinda comments from me its bedtime over here (I have a daytime job too :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
