On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 15:33 -0800, David Lutterkort wrote:
> I would hugely prefer approach (3) since it seems the least intrusive in
> terms of changing expectations of how a ruby installation is laid out;
> noarch packages would install their code into sitelibdir.
One more bit for consideration: because it looks like some backwards
incompatible changes are inevitable, this would be a good opportunity to
move the noarch parts to /usr/share. The benefits would be the
usual /usr/share ones, like %{_netsharedpath} and read only (NFS)
mounts.
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
