On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:03 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Jeremy Katz wrote: > > With FC5 on the way and the advent of the repo-aware replacement for > > system-config-packages (pirut), we're now in a much better position for > > making it easy for users to gain access to applications. > > > > So, you might ask, what can I do to help? Well, if you maintain an > > application which makes sense for a user to select[1], check out the > > comps module and make sure that your package is listed in a reasonable > > group in the comps-fe5.xml.in file. If it's not, feel free to add it > > using the following as a template if your package were named "foo": > > <packagereq type="optional">foo</packagereq> > > If you think there needs to be a new group, please let me know. > Should there be a "Fortran Development" group? I have ftnchek that > would belong. At the moment, I'd just throw it in the general development-tools category. Realistically, I don't like any of the "foo-development" groups that are language specific. Just haven't had ideas for better ways to categorize yet :-/ Jeremy -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
