> Also, your arguments about trying to make FE spec files match (as > closely as possible down to the tags) some generic upstream spec file > don't, in my opinion, hold any water. The point of FE is to produce > packages for Fedora. If they happen to work elsewhere or if they happen > to look similar to spec files elsewhere, then thats just a coincidence. > Its not a design goal of FE and is not (IMO) a point that should carry > any weight in a discussion of Fedora conventions. I completly agree. And I never argued that to be a convention. However, the other reason still hold, which is what to do to keep spec files synced for all the branches. In that case what is better: 1. Bump version on the devel spec for each and every build, and jump version number for the FC-x up to the devel version when it is time to sync the spec. 2. add .x to the devel spec for each build, and bump release number when the specs are synced. I personaly prefer 1. and I always use 1. when I don't want to add a %changelog entry. Thoughts? -- Pat -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
