Re: rpms/libnc-dap/devel libnc-dap.spec,1.3,1.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Why don't you simply increment the release?
> 
> Extending to the Release tag makes sense on branches, but doesn't on
> devel.

Because I try as much as possible (for that package) to keep the 
spec file similar with the one provided upstream, as the upstream spec 
is based on this spec and upstream builds for fc. So, if there is a change
in that specfile which is also needed upstream, I can bump the release
remove the extension in the changelog and keep them in sync.

When I really need to depart from upstream, I do it, but I try to minimize
the differences.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux