ville.skytta@xxxxxx (Ville Skyttä) writes: >> When I dictate somebody, then the packager. For the admin, >> fedora-usermgmt is completely transparent and he will not notice >> fedora-usermgmt's existence (except from the package list). > > As said earlier in this thread, the "except" part is bad enough for > some of us. The only argument against fedora-usermgmt in this thread was "my spec file does not build for other distributions without modifications". But sorry, this argument is void because this is a Fedora Extras list, not a cross-distribution one. > FWIW, the only way I can personally see that happen is by you stopping > to insist on minor details and accepting some of the compromises Which compromises? Violating basic packaging rules (omitting Requires: for tools used in %scriptlets) and cluttering the spec file with errorprone scriptlets? I am still thinking about the "package-a-modified-shadow-utils" suggestion... Enrico
Attachment:
pgptqk1k3js2f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
