On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 12:32 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > When I dictate somebody, then the packager. For the > admin, fedora-usermgmt is completely transparent and he will not notice > fedora-usermgmt's existence (except from the package list). As said earlier in this thread, the "except" part is bad enough for some of us. Anyway, something clearly needs to happen. Even if you continue to disregard the concerns people have about various aspects of fedora-usermgmt, the sheer amount of noise, confusion, opinion-parroting, and frequently reappearing threads on the subject here should seriously ring a bell. It needs to stop. FWIW, the only way I can personally see that happen is by you stopping to insist on minor details and accepting some of the compromises suggested by various folks, or by dropping the package from FE. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
