On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 06:47 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > David Lutterkort wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 13:48 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > >>Mike McGrath wrote: > >> > >> > >>>The problem I have with the UserCreation page in the wiki is it provides > >>>no non fedora-usermgmt creation alternatives. And since fedora-usermgmt > >>>is not yet in wide adoption I'm very hesitant to use it. > >> > >>Which in the scope of Fedora Extras is a small/non issue, IMO. AFAIK, > >>fedora-usermgmt acts (almost) exactly like the usual useradd when it's > >>not specially configured by end-users. > > > > > > It also makes the specfile immediately fedora-centric. > > This is *Fedora* Extras afterall. (-: Wrong. Your systems are not in an "all Fedora network". IMO using fedora-usermgmt must be banned from RPMs and should remain a 100% transparent run-time option to the standard useradmin tools to sysadmins who really want it. Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list