Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-03-07 06:20 EST ------- * Mon Mar 06 2006 Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 2.18.3-1.3 - added 'desktop-file-utils' BR - moved the gnome icon the a common place - added -server-xinetd subpackage - added -server-ssh subpackage for ssh-setup - added logrotate support http://ensc.de/fedora/distcc.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/distcc-2.18.3-1.3.src.rpm =============== > W: distcc incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.18.3-0.6 2.18.3-1 > The version your changelog refers to should be 2.18.3-1 ok, will be fixed (at least in the released version ;)) > W: distcc conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/distcc.sh > As this is no config-file this warning seems to be ignorable > > E: distcc executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/profile.d/distcc.sh > You should add distcc.sh separately not flagging it as a config. > This will make the warning above go away, too. I removed the 'x' bit from the distcc.sh. But I think that it should be marked as a simple %config: there should be no need to edit this file but changes should not be lost silently. > E: distcc script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/distcc.sh > "!#" is missing in your shellscript The shellbang warning is bogus; the profile.d scripts will be source'd but not executed. > W: distcc dangerous-command-in-%preun rm > W: distcc dangerous-command-in-%trigger ln > W: distcc dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm > I don't know how dangerous this really is. Please check that. should be ok... > W: distcc-gnome non-standard-group Development/Applications > This should just be one of /usr/share/doc/rpm-4.?.?/GROUPS is now Development/Tools > W: distcc-server-lsb conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/distccd > This is no config-file, don't flag it as such. initscripts are usually marked as simple %config files (there should be no need to edit them but changes should not be lost silently.) > W: distcc-server-lsb no-documentation > The manpage for the server is missing: %{_mandir}/man1/distccd.1.gz the -server subpackage has this man-page and this subpackage is required by -server-lsb. > E: distcc-server-lsb postin-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/distccd > E: distcc-server-lsb preun-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/distccd > "chkconfig -add distccd" and "chkconfig -del distccd" is needed for > correctly un-/installing the server package there ARE rules to register/unregister the service -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
