[Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: nickle


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184011





------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx  2006-03-05 08:06 EST -------
Not a full review, as I am still awaiting sponsorship, but:
1) Description of devel package is ... lacking :)

2) Source0: http://nickle.org/release/nickle-%{version}.tar.gz could be replaced
with Source0: http://nickle.org/release/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

3) You shouldn't install the INSTALL file as part of %doc - the package is
installed, don't confuse users by adding installation instructions :)

4) rpmlint only gives one error about the GPG key (so I think all is fine):
rpmlint nickle-2.53-1.src.rpm
E: nickle unknown-key GPG#f77eed90



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux