On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 10:20 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > Upstream's specs are completely irrelevant for FE. The only thing that > > I think that being able to be in sync with apstream spec is nice, although > I agree that it shouldn't lead to bad practices. I don't try to sync > with upstream in that case, but I think that extending the release isn't > such a case. > > > matters is consistency within Fedora. > > It also allows to keep spec file in sync for the different branches. Non sense. devel must always be greater than the rest. > It also allows to keep spec file in sync for the different branches. branches! -- Devel isn't a branch. > > All you are doing, is adding unnecessary and avoidable complexity. > Where is the complexity? Then let me negate it: It is less simple than it could be. These simply isn't any need to do this. > > IMNSHO, FE's conventions on release tags should be tighted and > > explicitly disallow this kind of usage. > > I don't think so. It should be up to the packager. ... Sometimes I feel sooo tired ... ... I could not disagree more ... Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
