On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 13:32 -0500, Warren Togami wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 13:07 -0500, Warren Togami wrote: > >> Hey folks, > > > >> Anybody see any huge problems here? > > Not huge, except that I find this proposal counterproductive to FE, > > because > > > > * All on FE is about to getting competent people involved, and not to > > hide maintainers away and give people the impression of "These dumb nuts > > are so stupid to do the work for you". > > How is this promoting this idea? Quite simple: People reading fedora-extras-list won't see anything about packaging issues, however 90% of FE is about packaging. > fedora-extras-list is supposed to be a devel discussion list, So far, except of some guys abusing FE package submission/review as their testbed, there is not much of actual fedora-extra development, nor do I see substantial future FE-development. Most of fedora extra development is packaging. > > With your split, I fear we will soon see the fedora-list trolls popping > > up on fedora-extras and a further decrease in quality of packages, > > because first-time SUBMITTERS had not been confronted with packaging > > issues in advance. > > > > Ralf > > I see no real difference in splitting the current traffic of > fedora-extras-list into two lists. You have the option of filtering > both lists into a single folder so you personally see no change. You've got it: It doesn't matter if we have several lists or one. Users can filter, ... so why do you want to change the status-quo? To nag current fedora-list subscriber's with having to re-implement/duplicate/fix their list filters and having to deal with more mail duplicates? Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
