Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755 ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2006-02-16 00:27 EST ------- The License is very close to the MIT license. It's even closer to the STL license. However, it's not exactly either of them as it has the name of the author in some places. Best I suppose would be to make the License field "STL" as thats what it's closest to, and file a RFE against rpmlint to add that license. I think rpmlint only recognizes the MIT tag as thats what OSI calls the MIT/X11 license. gnu.org calls it only the X11 license and says "This license is sometimes called the "MIT" license, but that term is misleading, since MIT has used many licenses for software." I guess I do see a number of packages using X11/MIT, so I guess rpmlint should recognize either of the forms of this same license (X11, MIT/X11, MIT). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
