Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755 ------- Additional Comments From wart@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-02-16 00:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > ok, I did some searching around. It appears the license is really a SGI/STL > license ( something like: http://www.mcda.org/help/stl.html ). > > From what I could gather this is a very close variant of the MIT license, > so it should be ok to ship. > > Note that rpmlint only has "MIT" as a valid license, not MIT/X11. > > I would say change the License to just MIT and then it's APPROVED. I disagree. IMHO, I don't think we should be changing license tags just to silence rpmlint warnings. If rpmlint warns about it then make a note of it in the spec file, file a bug with rpmlint, and live with the warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
